I bought an M1 Macbook Air like almost 2 months ago.
It wouldn't be unrealistic to think many had done code in 68k, but POWER and others might prove a trifle hard. That is what I would suggest, if GOG even had even ⅖ of the talent pool of developer work. Now might be a good time for GOG to do the same for a project like Sheepshaver, Basilisk II, vMac, and PearPC, roll em into a united umbrella, develop a non-copyright system ROM that can shapeshift according to certain detections, and Robert's your uncle. If so, why bother? So you know how Valve did their whole Proton thing that was basically an "Option 3" while also catapulting the development of Wine ahead several years? Because they were concerned that there was a non-zero chance of Windows going gilded cage? Is this not just competition to Steam at this point. If that is true, then essentially I'll curb purchasing from here on out. These are long gone games that GOG (known before as Good "Old" Games) bottled up for use on modern systems.
Sheepshaver m1 update#
Where is the value in that if you have to roll your own? I get it, a lot of gaming companies fly by night and don't update their code past a year or two. Thedocbwarren: What you are suggesting is this is a collection of abondonware. What you are suggesting is this is a collection of abondonware.
Sheepshaver m1 mac os#
There’s a bit of irony in this since there are windows users here who complain about gog dropping support for older versions of windows but that gog will likely only support older versions of Mac OS now. I also don’t view it as Gogs responsibility to update other companies software to work on a new platform. Gog does not have a solid base of Mac users. Firstpastthepost: Even software companies that rely heavily on Mac users have been slow to update their software to be compatible with Apple’s new chips, and they have a solid base of Mac users.
0 kommentar(er)
